![]() To answer at least some of those questions - and deliver a little cinematic justice - here's a list some of the most egregious cases in which the site either maligned a good film or elevated a bad one.īe honest: "Jurassic World" sucked. Yes, that's absurd - but it does raise valid questions about whether the website's black-or-white, win-or-lose mentality unfairly disadvantages movies that happened to fall on the wrong side of the critical consensus or overly rewards films that just so happened to get a few mildly positive reviews. Last year, fans of the movie "Suicide Squad" circulated a petition attacking Rotten Tomatoes for designating the film as "rotten" due to its overwhelmingly bad reviews. Moviegoers too have been laying into the site. As Hollywood tries to make sense of its current box office slump, producers, actors and directors have been pointing at the critical aggregator, which quantifies movie reviews and deems Tinseltown's beloved properties as either "fresh" or (gasp!) "rotten." Rotten Tomatoes has been catching a lot of heat lately.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |